A public discussion is stirring on the topic of nonprofit overhead and the extent to which overhead costs should influence giving. The three leading sources of information about nonprofits recently issued a call to action asking individual and institutional donors to stop using “overhead” as the measure of a nonprofit’s success. GuideStar, Charity Navigator, and BBB Wise Giving Alliance have issued a call to donors to move beyond the “Overhead Myth.”
Here’s the background. Nonprofits are required to report administrative costs and fundraising costs when they file their 990 form with the IRS. These are costs that are not directly related to nonprofit services or programs. Administrative costs include things such as human resources and accounting personnel, information technology and management systems. Fundraising costs include staff time and materials dedicated to donor development, and fundraising events among others. Together these represent “overhead.”
Some people believe that low overhead is a sign of an effective and well run nonprofit. We join GuideStar, Charity Navigator, and BBB Wise Giving Alliance and others in taking a different stance. Long time readers know that we believe “impact” is the measure of a nonprofit. And, for many organizations and institutions high impact requires an investment in what we refer to as “capacity and infrastructure” or “overhead.” Nonprofits need to invest in technology and talented staff. They need to compensate employees with competitive salaries and benefits and provide them with the tools they need to best deliver on their mission and vision.
Overhead ratios do not communicate effectiveness. Emphasizing these ratios as a basis for funding and giving decisions has led to what the Stanford Social Innovation Review has called the The Nonprofit Starvation Cycle and what the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy, Urban Institute & Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University refers to as Getting What We Pay For: Low Overhead Limits Nonprofit Effectiveness.
Overhead costs and ratios may vary from year to year, and from institution to institution. There are always new ways to consider minimizing costs, but a “race to the bottom” is not what the nonprofit sector needs. Consider looking at impact instead. Encourage the nonprofits you believe in to participate in Charting Impact (www.ChartingImpact.org). Prepare to answer these five questions: What is your organization aiming to accomplish? What are your strategies for making this happen? What are your organization’s capabilities for doing this? How will your organization know if you are making progress? What have and haven’t you accomplished so far?
If you are concerned about how donated funds are used by a nonprofit you support, take the time to review their annual report, their 990 form (posted online at wwww.Guidestar.org, and ask to speak with management. Looking at overhead costs won’t answer your questions.
Learn more at www.overheadmyth.com.
Mel and Pearl Shaw are the authors of “Prerequisites for Fundraising Success” and “The Fundraiser’s Guide to Soliciting Gifts.” They provide fundraising counsel to nonprofits. Visit them at www.saadandshaw.com. Follow them @saadshaw.
We were recently asked what we thought about setting a fundraising goal for fiscal year 2014 by simply adding 10% to the 2013 goal. Good question. And of course we had questions of our own. The first of which was “did the nonprofit meet its 2013 goal?” The answer – and the reasons why – will be important to take into consideration when setting a goal for 2014.
To be the best, learn from the best – and in fundraising, Pearl Saad and her husband Melvin B. Shaw, have the creds to not just teach fundraising essentials but to literally “write the books” about it. In an updated version of The Fundraiser’s Guide to Soliciting Gifts, first published in 2008, everything you need to know is laid out in this small but powerful compilation in the form of how to’s for the novice and gentle reminders for the veteran.
“Trusting relationships and reflection/rejuvenation are required for building strong networks and collaborations.” That’s the word from Patricia Brandes, executive director of the Barr Foundation. She didn’t say more funding, more collaboration, lower expenses or greater impact. She focuses on the three R’s – relationships, reflection and rejuvenation.
Emergencies and disasters are unthinkable everyday occurrences. Some big, some small. They impact us as individuals, families, communities and sometimes as a nation. The question is not if an emergency or disaster will occur, but when. Being prepared makes a difference. As a nonprofit leader your responsibilities in the area of preparation extend beyond those we have as individuals and family members. You are responsible for creating a COOP – a continuity of operation plan for your nonprofit.
FUNdraising Good Times 